[Dprglist] Seeing the RoboColumbus cones
Steve Edwards
steve.edwards214 at gmail.com
Tue Dec 6 16:33:13 PST 2016
Flame cultivator in actionhttps://youtu.be/PuuSJf8JHq4
Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S® 6, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone
-------- Original message --------From: David Anderson <davida at smu.edu> Date: 12/6/16 12:20 AM (GMT-06:00) To: John Swindle <swindle at compuserve.com>, dprglist at lists.dprg.org Subject: Re: [Dprglist] Seeing the RoboColumbus cones
Flame cultivator. Awesome. I googled "cotton farm flame
cultivator" and came up with this:
https://flameengineering.com/pages/agricultural-flaming-guide
Invented by one Price McLemore in 1938. Clever. I want to see one
in action!
cheers
dpa
On 12/05/2016 11:28 PM, John Swindle
wrote:
Dave,
Great stuff. Thanks for setting me straight on the
already-uniqueness of the orange cones.
But I'm still not making my point (largely because I'm still
slowly formulating it). At the same time, I get your point,
which is: Go and do it! But vision-related stuff is just not
interesting for me to pursue.
More of my point: It's not to look for, say, an orange cone,
but to look for, say, a plastic thing or a rubber thing or a
wood (or non-wood) thing. Unique in the arena and likely
unique in a large unconstrained space.
My interest in this is to build a robot that weeds the yard. I
suspect that it is insufficient to look at leaf shapes, and I
suspect that different plants have other signatures that will
be easier to detect, as with the Earth sciences satellites
that see what kind of trees are in a forest.
When I saw a root heater weed killer for sale (basically a
soldering iron on a stick), I got interested in having a
gadget wander about the yard, selectively cooking the roots of
undesired plants. A vinegar spray works also, but the root
heater is more precise. (A flame cultivator is more dramatic
though. We had those on the cotton farm.)
You say we often build stuff that is purpose-built to win an
arbitrary contest. In this case, I am looking for something
that serves as a sensor for something beyond color and
shape differences. It would be great if it involved sound!
Talk to the weeds.
I thought we developed sight for visible light because that's
what gets through the atmosphere. Water has a big impact on
the atmosphere as well.
And so a UV sensor would be OK for a robot because it would
either be designed to not get burned up by UV, or we wouldn't
care that the sensor only lasted a few years. We try to
anthropomorphize things too much, building our own limitations
into our creations.
Good stuff. Back to slowly formulating now.
John Swindle
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.dprg.org/pipermail/dprglist-dprg.org/attachments/20161206/15d7ede0/attachment.htm>
More information about the DPRGlist
mailing list