[Dprglist] NUCLEO STM32 L476RG - using micropython - .dfu files
Jim Merkle
jim at merkles.com
Sat Oct 23 06:57:20 PDT 2021
Your NUCLEO board has an on-board JTAG development interface. All your
development action is through this JTAG part, usually a STM32-F013 chip.
This interface also provides a "FTDI" USB Host interface with your
board that usually connects to UART 2 (See NUCLEAO schematic.) That guy
wasn't using a NUCLEO, or was just clueless. I have some STM32 projects
on my website: www.merkles.com [2]. I prefer to use the STM32-CUBE,
since it configures all the peripherals for you into source code. After
that, there are multiple environments to use. I believe the majority of
people use STM tools. I continually run into roadblocks when trying to
use MBED. They are great for "Hello World", but after that, you'll
likely get stuck. My favorite "Go To" NUCLEO is the NUCLEO-F446RE. The
processor is packed with peripheral support, and it's relatively cheap.
The folks that don't have any money usually head toward the "Blue Pill",
a small STM32-F103RB development board. But, after you get JTAG
adapter, and FTDI serial added, the price becomes close to the
NUCLEO-F103 board. I HATE the Blue Pill since it doesn't provide a
reset signal from the target processor to the JTAG interface. This
means you have to play games with the reset switch to get software to
load to the target each time. BTW, MicroPython runs great on the
F446RE.
---
Jim Merkle
Carrollton, TX 75007
jim at merkles.com
On 2021-10-23 00:07, Thalanayar Muthukumar via DPRGlist wrote:
> Is downloading dfu file to the NUCLEO STM32 as complicated as
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1r_Pyyc_6e8 ? - cutting a usb cable,
> creating custom USB connector and using dfuse software? Seems
> complicated
>
> Or is there a simpler way?
>
> Regards.
> - Kumar
>
> On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 11:44 PM Thalanayar Muthukumar
> <tnkumar at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VNPOWBemGqU
>
> Got my NUCLEO L476RG today and got my first Blinky work on it.
> I thought of starting with STM32CubeIDE and micropython, but could not
> figure out how to use these environments.
> Then, I came across mbed.org [1] and was able to get the cpp program
> for blinky working.
>
> What do people use as their development environment for the STM32
> boards?
> Need suggestions on what is best to use to get the best experience with
> the STM32.
>
> Every new chip has its own development environment, startup challenges
> that one needs to go through ...
>
> Regards.
> - Kumar
>
> On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 4:04 PM <dprglist-request at lists.dprg.org>
> wrote: Send DPRGlist mailing list submissions to
> dprglist at lists.dprg.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.dprg.org/listinfo.cgi/dprglist-dprg.org
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> dprglist-request at lists.dprg.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> dprglist-owner at lists.dprg.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of DPRGlist digest..."
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Fwd: Need suggestion for expansion boards for STM32 to
> build a robot (Murray Altheim)
> 2. Re: Fwd: Need suggestion for expansion boards for STM32 to
> build a robot (secretary at dprg.org)
> 3. Re: Fwd: Need suggestion for expansion boards for STM32 to
> build a robot (deltagraph at aol.com)
> 4. Re: Fwd: Need suggestion for expansion boards for STM32 to
> build a robot (David P. Anderson)
> 5. Re: Need suggestion for expansion boards for STM32 to build a
> robot (Chris N)
> 6. Re: Need suggestion for expansion boards for STM32 to build a
> robot (Thalanayar Muthukumar)
> 7. Robotic Boat (David P. Anderson)
> 8. Re: Robotic Boat (Doug Paradis)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2021 12:15:52 +1300
> From: Murray Altheim <murray18 at altheim.com>
> To: dprglist at lists.dprg.org
> Subject: Re: [Dprglist] Fwd: Need suggestion for expansion boards for
> STM32 to build a robot
> Message-ID: <5712e42f-ca49-c21d-a17e-5e2a97de2293 at altheim.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
>
> On 22/10/21 6:08 am, Doug Paradis via DPRGlist wrote:
> [...] An?alternative is a board laid out by club member Ron Grant.
> Ron's board
>> requires some more work on your part, but breaks out all the pins. It
>> is
>> much larger than the UNO sensor shield, but has some nice features. It
>> may
>> require having it built at a PCB company.
> Hi Doug,
>
> Has Ron released the files for that board somewhere? Because nowadays
> it's
> almost trivial to send a board spec off to a fab shop and have them
> made
> and sent back quickly and cheaply, possibly cheaper than from Adafruit
> or
> another hobbyist vendor (you may be able to buy them for roughly the
> cost
> that Adafruit does as an OEM).
>
> Having the board files available would be a boon to the robotics
> community,
> as even I (!) am now looking at STM32 boards, among them the
> Nucleo-64s.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Murray
>
> ...........................................................................
> Murray Altheim <murray18 at altheim dot com> = =
> ===
> http://www.altheim.com/murray/ ===
> ===
> = = ===
> In the evening
> The rice leaves in the garden
> Rustle in the autumn wind
> That blows through my reed hut.
> -- Minamoto no Tsunenobu
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 19:43:38 -0500
> From: "secretary at dprg.org" <secretary at dprg.org>
> To: Murray Altheim <murray18 at altheim.com>
> Cc: DPRG <dprglist at lists.dprg.org>
> Subject: Re: [Dprglist] Fwd: Need suggestion for expansion boards for
> STM32 to build a robot
> Message-ID:
> <CAOdUW+Zz7Ze7RHo+zW9r9Y2bYBoLyvAp0cEs0sGiMG8DZbHRhQ at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Murray,
> That would be up to Ron, he owns the files.
> Regards,
> Doug P.
>
> On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 6:23 PM Murray Altheim via DPRGlist <
> dprglist at lists.dprg.org> wrote:
>
>> On 22/10/21 6:08 am, Doug Paradis via DPRGlist wrote:
>> [...] An alternative is a board laid out by club member Ron Grant.
>> Ron's
>> board
>>> requires some more work on your part, but breaks out all the pins. It
>>> is
>>> much larger than the UNO sensor shield, but has some nice features.
>>> It
>> may
>>> require having it built at a PCB company.
>> Hi Doug,
>>
>> Has Ron released the files for that board somewhere? Because nowadays
>> it's
>> almost trivial to send a board spec off to a fab shop and have them
>> made
>> and sent back quickly and cheaply, possibly cheaper than from Adafruit
>> or
>> another hobbyist vendor (you may be able to buy them for roughly the
>> cost
>> that Adafruit does as an OEM).
>>
>> Having the board files available would be a boon to the robotics
>> community,
>> as even I (!) am now looking at STM32 boards, among them the
>> Nucleo-64s.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Murray
>>
>> ...........................................................................
>> Murray Altheim <murray18 at altheim dot com> = =
>> ===
>> http://www.altheim.com/murray/ ===
>> ===
>> = =
>> ===
>> In the evening
>> The rice leaves in the garden
>> Rustle in the autumn wind
>> That blows through my reed hut.
>> -- Minamoto no Tsunenobu
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> DPRGlist mailing list
>> DPRGlist at lists.dprg.org
>> http://lists.dprg.org/listinfo.cgi/dprglist-dprg.org
>>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> <http://lists.dprg.org/pipermail/dprglist-dprg.org/attachments/20211021/5b78bad2/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2021 01:43:02 +0000 (UTC)
> From: deltagraph at aol.com
> To: "dprglist at lists.dprg.org" <dprglist at lists.dprg.org>
> Subject: Re: [Dprglist] Fwd: Need suggestion for expansion boards for
> STM32 to build a robot
> Message-ID: <1145443002.52144.1634866982774 at mail.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hello Doug / Murray,
> Are you talking about the board I created for David Anderson?
> I would consider that public domain if David does not mind...
> I can probably dig up the Eagle files for it if you don't have them.
> The board is shared on OshPark.com, but eagle (The tool I used for the
> board layout) design files might not be present?Let me know...
>
> One thing is I can't remember if I used other than basic eagle license
> version. I have some intermediate version that was about $800 back in
> the old days (circa 2010). I think there was an academic version
> available at the time for little money. The limitation was auto-router
> would not route beyond a board size of about 3"x4" or so, but you could
> manually route traces beyond that limit - which I did a few times way
> back around 2005.
>
> Getting the boards made though OshPark will be a bit expensive $72 for
> 3.I have used Chinese company Gojgo.com for larger quantities, but
> OshPark does have some deals there too...
>
> Might be other approaches building breakout boards that dock to Nucleo
> pin headers, but do not span entire Nucleo, if that makes sense - to
> reduce board square inches.?
>
> On Oshpark, search for shared project :? NucleoBot_DPA_2
> Ron
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Murray Altheim via DPRGlist <dprglist at lists.dprg.org>
> To: dprglist at lists.dprg.org
> Sent: Thu, Oct 21, 2021 6:15 pm
> Subject: Re: [Dprglist] Fwd: Need suggestion for expansion boards for
> STM32 to build a robot
>
> On 22/10/21 6:08 am, Doug Paradis via DPRGlist wrote:
> [...] An?alternative is a board laid out by club member Ron Grant.
> Ron's board
>> requires some more work on your part, but breaks out all the pins. It
>> is
>> much larger than the UNO sensor shield, but has some nice features. It
>> may
>> require having it built at a PCB company.
> Hi Doug,
>
> Has Ron released the files for that board somewhere? Because nowadays
> it's
> almost trivial to send a board spec off to a fab shop and have them
> made
> and sent back quickly and cheaply, possibly cheaper than from Adafruit
> or
> another hobbyist vendor (you may be able to buy them for roughly the
> cost
> that Adafruit does as an OEM).
>
> Having the board files available would be a boon to the robotics
> community,
> as even I (!) am now looking at STM32 boards, among them the
> Nucleo-64s.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Murray
>
> ...........................................................................
> Murray Altheim <murray18 at altheim dot com>? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? = =?
> ===
> http://www.altheim.com/murray/ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ===?
> ===
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? =
> =? ===
> ? ? In the evening
> ? ? The rice leaves in the garden
> ? ? Rustle in the autumn wind
> ? ? That blows through my reed hut.
> ? ? ? ? ? ? -- Minamoto no Tsunenobu
>
> _______________________________________________
> DPRGlist mailing list
> DPRGlist at lists.dprg.org
> http://lists.dprg.org/listinfo.cgi/dprglist-dprg.org
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> <http://lists.dprg.org/pipermail/dprglist-dprg.org/attachments/20211022/87c6eaf4/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 21:17:18 -0500
> From: "David P. Anderson" <davida at smu.edu>
> To: <dprglist at lists.dprg.org>
> Subject: Re: [Dprglist] Fwd: Need suggestion for expansion boards for
> STM32 to build a robot
> Message-ID: <17535899-d82e-4bfe-0e14-673b3ca150c2 at smu.edu>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"
>
> Ron,
>
> That's fine with me.? I'd probably chip in.
>
> Also the next-to-last version had a mistake, a pin shorted to ground.?
> Not sure which one is the OshPark file?
>
> David
>
> On 10/21/21 8:43 PM, Ron Grant via DPRGlist wrote:
>>> */[EXTERNAL SENDER]/* > > Hello Doug / Murray, > > Are you talking
> about the board I created for David Anderson? I would > consider that
> public domain if David does not mind... > > I can probably dig up the
> Eagle files for it if you don't have them. > > The board is shared on
> OshPark.com, but eagle (The tool I used for > the board layout) design
> files might not be present? Let me know... > > One thing is I can't
> remember if I used other than basic eagle > license version. I have
> some
> intermediate version that was about $800 > back in the old days (circa
> 2010). I think there was an academic > version available at the time
> for
> little money. The limitation was > auto-router would not route beyond a
> board size of about 3"x4" or so, > but you could manually route traces
> beyond that limit - which I did a > few times way back around 2005. > >
> Getting the boards made though OshPark will be a bit expensive $72 >
> for
> 3. I have used Chinese company Gojgo.com for larger quantities, > but
> OshPark does have some deals there too... > > Might be other approaches
> building breakout boards that dock to > Nucleo pin headers, but do not
> span entire Nucleo, if that makes > sense - to reduce board square
> inches. > > On Oshpark, search for shared project : NucleoBot_DPA_2 > >
> Ron > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- From: Murray Altheim via
> DPRGlist > <dprglist at lists.dprg.org> To: dprglist at lists.dprg.org Sent:
> Thu, Oct > 21, 2021 6:15 pm Subject: Re: [Dprglist] Fwd: Need
> suggestion
> for > expansion boards for STM32 to build a robot > > On 22/10/21 6:08
> am, Doug Paradis via DPRGlist wrote: [...] An > alternative is a board
> laid out by club member Ron Grant. Ron's > board >> requires some more
> work on your part, but breaks out all the pins. >> It is much larger
> than the UNO sensor shield, but has some nice >> features. It may
> require having it built at a PCB company. > Hi Doug, > > Has Ron
> released the files for that board somewhere? Because nowadays > it's
> almost trivial to send a board spec off to a fab shop and have > them
> made and sent back quickly and cheaply, possibly cheaper than > from
> Adafruit or another hobbyist vendor (you may be able to buy them > for
> roughly the cost that Adafruit does as an OEM). > > Having the board
> files available would be a boon to the robotics > community, as even I
> (!) am now looking at STM32 boards, among them > the Nucleo-64s. > >
> Cheers, > > Murray > >
> ...........................................................................
>> > Murray Altheim <murray18 at altheim dot com>????????????????????? =
> =? ===
>> http://www.altheim.com/murray/ >
> <http://secure-web.cisco.com/1uMwoWuJh8sM3pW1MNURF7he2-zKJSnyI8Uf_p02RD3D7vc8kPoxErh1bYLtOttiD-z41gCtWkM-2Epn4xxIgoOreeCNHAoP0aOJSiKMc41vKAdb5EsDhw74fr_DISXQ9nEYPBTbL1L_w-C-QJtPUHCW7H5qjF6LnpGbdkG93Qmn6ACn01ZkBgiqvqGRZKhrpWp8EJBkzGhhaPs2tBCBZuGdQOxO4K31f5mwvJS3gFa3yIrqvfoZGKVT50GegnYvWKBFx0rZ6Q5oL6c817VT8l_goQIaOcZ7Mah0rtC8uSi8/http%3A%2F%2Fwww.altheim.com%2Fmurray%2F>
>> === === = = === In the evening The rice leaves in the garden Rustle >
> in the autumn wind That blows through my reed hut. -- Minamoto no >
> Tsunenobu > > _______________________________________________ DPRGlist
> mailing > list DPRGlist at lists.dprg.org <mailto:DPRGlist at lists.dprg.org>
>> http://lists.dprg.org/listinfo.cgi/dprglist-dprg.org >
> <http://lists.dprg.org/listinfo.cgi/dprglist-dprg.org> > >
> _______________________________________________ DPRGlist mailing > list
> DPRGlist at lists.dprg.org >
> http://lists.dprg.org/listinfo.cgi/dprglist-dprg.or
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> <http://lists.dprg.org/pipermail/dprglist-dprg.org/attachments/20211021/8c2b572d/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2021 07:42:43 -0400
> From: Chris N <netterchris at gmail.com>
> To: Thalanayar Muthukumar <tnkumar at gmail.com>
> Cc: DPRG <dprglist at lists.dprg.org>
> Subject: Re: [Dprglist] Need suggestion for expansion boards for STM32
> to build a robot
> Message-ID:
> <CA++ApaXK_WjCSmCvyzg8Fg5Y4VfdaU1nN_91eBk_tuZ1c0qeJw at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Kumar,
> In principle that Arduino shield should work for you, provided there
> are no
> issues with voltage levels. The STM32 is 5V-tolerant, so probably
> nothing
> to worry about on that end. Maybe more of a question if the Shield
> gets
> the voltage it needs. It probably will, because the arduino headers
> have a
> pin reserved for 5V. It's just one of those things worth double
> checking,
> though, before you start banging your head against the wall....
> Maybe more worth noting is the fact that the shield uses the L293 motor
> driver (not the 298). The L293 is not exactly very powerful. 1.2A
> max.
>
> P.S.: what happened to your plans with Pi + Ubuntu + ROS ? Is the
> STM32
> an addition to that setup, or instead of that Pi-based setup?
>
> Chris.
>
> On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 3:19 PM Thalanayar Muthukumar
> <tnkumar at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Chris.
>> I have this Arduino shield (
>> https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B01LX9TLP5/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_asin_title_o01_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1)
>> which can possibly be used with the NUCLEO - I may need to confirm
>> that the
>> voltage levels match. Beyond that, in the initial phase, I have my
>> I2C(StemmaQT) BN055 and StemmaQT OLED display that I may want to use.
>>
>> In later stages, after I get my initial STM32 robot moving, may
>> consider
>> other sensors.
>>
>> Regards.
>> - Kumar
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 7:16 AM Christian M Netter
>> <netterchris at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Do you have a rough idea of what type of sensors And actuators and
>>> how
>>> many of each you will be connecting?
>>>
>>> That will tell you what type of I/O and how much of each you will
>>> need
>>>
>>> What is lacking from the nucleo board that you purchased?
>>>
>>> Most STM 32 boards probably have enough I/O for a basic robot so you
>>> might not actually need an expansion.
>>>
>>> The only thing you might need is a motor driver.
>>>
>>> Chris
>>>
>>> On Oct 21, 2021, at 12:05 AM, Thalanayar Muthukumar via DPRGlist <
>>> dprglist at lists.dprg.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> ?
>>> So far, in the past few months, I have been building Arduino or RPi
>>> based
>>> robots.
>>> I decided next, to use the STM32 and ordered a NUCLEO STM32L476RG
>>> Kit.
>>>
>>> Need suggestions for expansion boards that can help me build a robot.
>>> I see many Arduino shields and Pi Hats, but could not locate the
>>> right
>>> expansion board.
>>>
>>> Or instead of the NUCLEO kit, should I be looking at other STM32
>>> boards?
>>> I do not want to build a custom board.
>>>
>>> Regards.
>>> - Kumar
>>>
>>>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> <http://lists.dprg.org/pipermail/dprglist-dprg.org/attachments/20211022/f25e68b6/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2021 06:53:11 -0500
> From: Thalanayar Muthukumar <tnkumar at gmail.com>
> To: Chris N <netterchris at gmail.com>
> Cc: DPRG <dprglist at lists.dprg.org>
> Subject: Re: [Dprglist] Need suggestion for expansion boards for STM32
> to build a robot
> Message-ID: <8414D2B6-F2AB-4DEE-A22F-A3C4C5671012 at gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Thanks Chris for the inputs.
> The STM32 is in addition to the RPi setup. Post the last update, I have
> not had the time to work on my RPi setup.
>
> Regards.
> - Kumar
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Oct 22, 2021, at 6:42 AM, Chris N <netterchris at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> ?
>>
>> Kumar,
>> In principle that Arduino shield should work for you, provided there
>> are no issues with voltage levels. The STM32 is 5V-tolerant, so
>> probably nothing to worry about on that end. Maybe more of a question
>> if the Shield gets the voltage it needs. It probably will, because
>> the arduino headers have a pin reserved for 5V. It's just one of
>> those things worth double checking, though, before you start banging
>> your head against the wall....
>> Maybe more worth noting is the fact that the shield uses the L293
>> motor driver (not the 298). The L293 is not exactly very powerful.
>> 1.2A max.
>>
>> P.S.: what happened to your plans with Pi + Ubuntu + ROS ? Is the
>> STM32 an addition to that setup, or instead of that Pi-based setup?
>>
>> Chris.
>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 3:19 PM Thalanayar Muthukumar
>>> <tnkumar at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Thanks Chris.
>>> I have this Arduino shield
>>> (https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B01LX9TLP5/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_asin_title_o01_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1)
>>> which can possibly be used with the NUCLEO - I may need to confirm
>>> that the voltage levels match. Beyond that, in the initial phase, I
>>> have my I2C(StemmaQT) BN055 and StemmaQT OLED display that I may want
>>> to use.
>>>
>>> In later stages, after I get my initial STM32 robot moving, may
>>> consider other sensors.
>>>
>>> Regards.
>>> - Kumar
>>>
>>>> On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 7:16 AM Christian M Netter
>>>> <netterchris at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Do you have a rough idea of what type of sensors And actuators and
>>>> how many of each you will be connecting?
>>>>
>>>> That will tell you what type of I/O and how much of each you will
>>>> need
>>>>
>>>> What is lacking from the nucleo board that you purchased?
>>>>
>>>> Most STM 32 boards probably have enough I/O for a basic robot so you
>>>> might not actually need an expansion.
>>>>
>>>> The only thing you might need is a motor driver.
>>>>
>>>> Chris
>>>>
>>>> On Oct 21, 2021, at 12:05 AM, Thalanayar Muthukumar via DPRGlist
>>>> <dprglist at lists.dprg.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> ?
>>>> So far, in the past few months, I have been building Arduino or RPi
>>>> based robots.
>>>> I decided next, to use the STM32 and ordered a NUCLEO STM32L476RG
>>>> Kit.
>>>>
>>>> Need suggestions for expansion boards that can help me build a
>>>> robot.
>>>> I see many Arduino shields and Pi Hats, but could not locate the
>>>> right expansion board.
>>>>
>>>> Or instead of the NUCLEO kit, should I be looking at other STM32
>>>> boards?
>>>> I do not want to build a custom board.
>>>>
>>>> Regards.
>>>> - Kumar
>>>>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> <http://lists.dprg.org/pipermail/dprglist-dprg.org/attachments/20211022/1c4b8b14/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2021 14:51:52 -0500
> From: "David P. Anderson" <davida at smu.edu>
> To: DPRG <dprglist at lists.dprg.org>
> Subject: [Dprglist] Robotic Boat
> Message-ID: <4435425e-855c-6fb9-9d57-eb079d452c50 at smu.edu>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed
>
> Just made 1000 mile journey autonomously around coastline of Denmark.??
> Note the use of "sparse waypoints" as we've discussed recently.
>
> https://boingboing.net/2021/10/22/a-robot-tugboat-just-made-a-successful-1000-mile-journey-overseas.html
>
> cheers!
>
> dpa
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2021 15:45:48 -0500
> From: Doug Paradis <paradug at gmail.com>
> To: "David P. Anderson" <davida at smu.edu>
> Cc: DPRG <dprglist at lists.dprg.org>
> Subject: Re: [Dprglist] Robotic Boat
> Message-ID:
> <CAOdUW+YHMpa0wHwHThbjUJNvUpN5oXTdpFZCMsjUbSn1Qj_i0Q at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> David,
> Here is an autonomous boat (https://www.locarbftw.com/) that I have
> been studying to help with the MavLink communications for my rover.
> Looks
> like a really fun project.
> Regards,
> Doug P.
>
> On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 2:51 PM David P. Anderson via DPRGlist <
> dprglist at lists.dprg.org> wrote:
>
>> Just made 1000 mile journey autonomously around coastline of Denmark.
>> Note the use of "sparse waypoints" as we've discussed recently.
>>
>>
>> https://boingboing.net/2021/10/22/a-robot-tugboat-just-made-a-successful-1000-mile-journey-overseas.html
>>
>> cheers!
>>
>> dpa
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> DPRGlist mailing list
>> DPRGlist at lists.dprg.org
>> http://lists.dprg.org/listinfo.cgi/dprglist-dprg.org
>>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> <http://lists.dprg.org/pipermail/dprglist-dprg.org/attachments/20211022/bcae7fb4/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> DPRGlist mailing list
> DPRGlist at lists.dprg.org
> http://lists.dprg.org/listinfo.cgi/dprglist-dprg.org
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of DPRGlist Digest, Vol 67, Issue 1
> ***************************************
_______________________________________________
DPRGlist mailing list
DPRGlist at lists.dprg.org
http://lists.dprg.org/listinfo.cgi/dprglist-dprg.org
Links:
------
[1] http://mbed.org
[2] http://www.merkles.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.dprg.org/pipermail/dprglist-dprg.org/attachments/20211023/0d8db2eb/attachment.html>
More information about the DPRGlist
mailing list